ROME (AP) \u2014 The head of a religious art and culture center founded by a disgraced Jesuit priest came to his defense Saturday after he was expelled from the Jesuit religious order following allegations of sexual, spiritual and psychological abuse against adult women.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maria Campatelli, director of the Rome-based Aletti Center, said the claims against the Rev. Marko Ivan Rupnik were \u201cdefamatory and unproven\u201d and amounted to a form of mediatic \u201clynching\u201d against the Slovene priest and his art center.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Jesuits announced this week that Rupnik had been\u00a0expelled\u00a0from the order June 9 because of \u201cstubborn refusal to observe the vow of obedience.\u201d The Jesuits acted after Rupnik had been\u00a0accused by several women\u00a0of sexual, spiritual and psychological abuses over a 30-year period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Until the case exploded publicly late last year, Rupnik had largely escaped punishment, apparently thanks in part to his exalted status in the church and at the Vatican, where even the role of\u00a0Pope Francis\u00a0in the case came into question given the two Jesuits were reportedly close.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rupnik is one of the most celebrated religious artists in the Catholic Church, and his mosaics decorate churches and basilicas around the world, including at the Vatican. The Aletti center trains artists in his mosaic style to work on the commissions and also runs an editorial house that sells artistic reproductions, coffee table books and calendars.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a letter on the center\u2019s website Saturday, Campatelli accused Rupnik\u2019s Jesuit superiors of releasing partial information about the case. She said Rupnik had actually requested to leave the order in January and that other Jesuit priests at the Aletti center had made similar requests because of their \u201coverriding distrust of superiors.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
She accused the Jesuits of essentially concocting the \u201cdisobedience\u201d violation, by ordering Rupnik to transfer to a Jesuit community in Lombardy three months after he had requested to leave the order. She said the transfer order thus merely provided the \u201cprerequisite for a disobedience which in fact occurred.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Rev. Johan Verschueren, Rupnik\u2019s former superior, confirmed that the requests to leave the order were true, but disputed how Campatelli framed them. He declined further comment pending Rupnik\u2019s 30-day appeal period, though he quoted from a message he had received from one of Rupnik\u2019s victims who wrote him that \u201cthe declaration of Centro Aletti is extremely violent for all those who have dared to talk about the suffering they have endured.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Rupnik scandal exploded in December when Italian blogs and websites reported that consecrated women had complained for years about abuse by him, only to have their claims discredited or covered up by Rupnik\u2019s Jesuit superiors. The case posed a problem for the Vatican, the pope and the Jesuits because of suspicions that the charismatic priest\u00a0received preferential treatment\u00a0by the Holy See, where a Jesuit pope reigns and Jesuit priests are in top positions at the sex abuse office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Part of the dilemma was that Rupnik still had plenty of supporters, especially at the Aletti center, as evidence by Campatelli\u2019s vigorous defense of him. The Jesuit investigator who first uncovered the alleged victims\u2019 claims, Bishop Daniele Libanori, has lamented in correspondence that Rupnik\u2019s supporters had tried to discredit the accusers by questioning their mental health.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Campatelli blasted the Jesuits for what she said was their decision to \u201cfavor a media campaign based on defamatory and unproven accusations (which exposed Fr. Rupnik and the entire Aletti Center to forms of lynching), as opposed to providing the press with correct information based on acts and documents in their possession, demonstrating a different truth from what was being published.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
She said that Rupnik remained firm in his desire to leave the order and would continue to \u201clive this moment in discernment and ecclesial communion.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ROME (AP) \u2014 The head of a religious art and culture cen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2579,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-culture","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2578"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2580,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2578\/revisions\/2580"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2579"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}