{"id":544,"date":"2021-06-07T09:28:09","date_gmt":"2021-06-07T13:28:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/?p=544"},"modified":"2021-06-07T09:28:14","modified_gmt":"2021-06-07T13:28:14","slug":"high-court-asked-to-review-men-only-draft-registration-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/?p=544","title":{"rendered":"High court asked to review men-only draft registration law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

WASHINGTON (AP) \u2014 The Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether it\u2019s sex discrimination for the government to require only men to register for the draft when they turn 18.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question of whether it\u2019s unconstitutional to require men but not women to register could be viewed as one with little practical impact. The last time there was a draft was during the Vietnam War, and the military has been all-volunteer since. But the registration requirement is one of the few remaining places where federal law treats men and women differently, and women\u2019s groups are among those arguing that allowing it to stand is harmful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The justices could say as soon as Monday whether they will hear\u00a0a case\u00a0involving the Military Selective Service Act, which requires men to register for the draft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

WASHINGTON (AP) \u2014 The Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether it\u2019s sex discrimination for the government to require only men to register for the draft when they turn 18.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The question of whether it\u2019s unconstitutional to require men but not women to register could be viewed as one with little practical impact. The last time there was a draft was during the Vietnam War, and the military has been all-volunteer since. But the registration requirement is one of the few remaining places where federal law treats men and women differently, and women\u2019s groups are among those arguing that allowing it to stand is harmful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The justices could say as soon as Monday whether they will hear\u00a0a case<\/a>\u00a0involving the Military Selective Service Act, which requires men to register for the draft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The last time the high court considered the Military Selective Service Act, then-Justice William Rehnquist explained that the purpose of registration \u201cwas to prepare for a draft of combat troops.\u201d He said that because women could not serve in combat, the law was not unlawful sex discrimination that violated the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But military policy has changed. In 2013, the Department of Defense lifted the ban on women serving in combat. Two years later, the department said all military roles would be open to women without exception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just last year, a congressional commission concluded that the \u201ctime is right\u201d to extend the obligation to register to women. \u201cThe current disparate treatment of women unacceptably excludes women from a fundamental civic obligation and reinforces gender stereotypes about the role of women, undermining national security,\u201d\u00a0the commission said in a report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Biden administration is urging the justices not to take the case and to let Congress instead tackle the issue. Administration lawyers wrote in a brief that any \u201creconsideration of the constitutionality of the male-only registration requirement … would be premature at this time\u201d because Congress is \u201cactively considering\u201d the issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Selective Service System, the agency that oversees registration, said in a statement that it doesn\u2019t comment on pending litigation but that it is \u201ccapable of performing whatever mission Congress should mandate.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the court agrees to take the case, arguments wouldn\u2019t happen until the fall at the earliest, after the court\u2019s summer break. The court already has high-profile cases awaiting it then. They include a\u00a0major challenge to abortion rights\u00a0and an\u00a0appeal to expand gun rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The case about the draft is National Coalition For Men v. Selective Service System, 20-928.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

WASHINGTON (AP) \u2014 The Supreme Court is being asked to d […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":545,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=544"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":546,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/544\/revisions\/546"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.viewworld.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}